Level 102
The second method is the "old" method. I would use the modern one
Route::prefix('admin')->middleware(['first', 'second'])->group(function () {
Route::get('/orders/{id}', 'show');
Route::post('/orders', 'store');
});
1 like
Sep 22, 2022
6
Level 8
Route Middleware group and Prefix group - which is the the better syntax?
There are a few options to group routes:
Route::middleware(['first', 'second'])->group(function () {
or
Route::group(['middleware' => 'some_middleware']), (function () {
And then I also want to add the prefix:
Route::prefix('admin')->group(function () {
So what would be the preferred way to both have middleware and prefix on a group of routes? For example these 2:
Route::get('/orders/{id}', 'show');
Route::post('/orders', 'store');
Level 8
@Sinnbeck thank you, will use it as well
Level 8
@Sinnbeck Btw, is it possible to nest Middleware groups like so: (so that the last group in this example has both first, second and also its the only one that has third
Route::prefix('admin')->middleware(['first', 'second'])->group(function () {
Route::get('/orders/{id}', 'show');
Route::post('/orders', 'store');
//... more routes ...
Route::middleware(['third'])->group(function () {
Route::get('/some_route', 'show');
Route::post('/some_route', 'store');
});
});
Level 102
@Ligonsker Yeah you are free to nest as much as you wish :) I do this myself. The same can be done with prefixes
Route::prefix('admin')->middleware(['first', 'second'])->group(function () {
Route::prefix('orders')->middleware(['third'])->group(function () {
Route::get('{id}', 'show');
Route::post('', 'store');
});
});
1 like
Level 8
@Sinnbeck Awesome that's exactly what I need now! thank you again 😀
Level 102
@Ligonsker Hppy to help :)
1 like
Please or to participate in this conversation.