A few weeks ago I have installed the latest Linux Ubuntu. I like how I was forced in some way to use terminal, Google around and memorize some of the commands I'd use the most, and I really liked it.
As I've understood - the Mac OS X runs the very same terminal, the commands are the same, the environment and filesystem is pretty much the same. So why would I, as a PC user that dual-boots Windows and Linux, pay thousand(s) of euros for a MBP?
Yes, it's easier to and more suitable for development, built-in ssh, cool commands and all that good stuff. If I have/want to work on *nix, why wouldn't I just choose Ubuntu and install it on my PC? That way I don't have to pay lots of money to get MBP and still have pretty much the same result. Yeah, there's some cool software on MBP (that you have to pay for most likely) that you can't get to work on Ubuntu but there are alternatives. Is it really worth it paying thousand(s) of euros just to be able to purchase yet some more software and run it on MBP, considering the alternative software on Ubuntu where you get it all for free?
Just my two cents. I didn't mean to troll or anything, I am just curious. Don't get me wrong - I'd buy a MBP right away if it's really worth the money. I just want to know why's all that "my-dev-efficiency-increased-so-much-i'll-never-use-anything-else-ever-again-besides-mbp" fuss :)