Be part of JetBrains PHPverse 2026 on June 9 – a free online event bringing PHP devs worldwide together.

MikelMedina's avatar

Is it worth defining helper methods on models that traverse relationship chains?

I have a nested relationship chain in my app: WorkoutSession → Microcycle → Mesocycle → Macrocycle → User → actualTrainer.

I defined a helper method on the Microcycle model called actualTrainer() that traverses this chain internally:

public function actualTrainer() { return $this->mesocycle->macrocycle->user->actualTrainer()->first(); }

My question is: if I eager load all the relationships beforehand with load('mesocycle.macrocycle.user.actualTrainer'), will calling this helper method still use the already loaded relationships from memory? Or will it fire additional queries because it's traversing the chain through its own internal logic?

And more generally, does it make sense to define these kinds of helper methods on models when the relationships are this deeply nested, or is it better to always traverse the chain directly and rely on eager loading?

Thanks

0 likes
7 replies
ghabriel25's avatar

How did you define those relationships? Because these cases are very different

#1 Calling relationship, no data retrieved yet

$workoutSession->microcycle()

#2 Calling eloquent collection, data retrieved

$workoutSession->microcycle
MikelMedina's avatar

like this:

public function microcycles()

{

return $this->belongsTo(Microcycle::class);

}

imrandevbd's avatar

To answer your first question directly: Yes, your current setup will fire additional queries.

To use the eager-loaded data in memory, you need to access it as a property instead of a method:

public function actualTrainer() {
    return $this->mesocycle?->macrocycle?->user?->actualTrainer;
}

As for your second question about architecture: yes, it absolutely makes sense to define these helpers. It actually aligns perfectly with the Law of Demeter. Wrapping deep traversals in a helper keeps your views and controllers clean and prevents you from repeating massive chains all over your codebase.

That said, if you find yourself needing to actually query against this deep relationship (e.g., filtering Microcycle records by a specific trainer), standard helper methods won't work. For that, you should check out Staudenmeir's eloquent-has-many-deep package. It lets you define native Eloquent relationships across unlimited intermediate tables so you can eager load and query them directly.

MikelMedina's avatar

I think I might be misunderstanding something here, so let me explain how I currently have it structured.

In my case, actualTrainer() is not a relationship in itself but a helper method built on top of the existing trainers() relationship in the User model. It basically does something like:

return $this->trainers()->wherePivot('active', true)->limit(1);

Then, on Microcycle, I have another helper actualTrainer() that simply delegates through the chain:

return $this->mesocycle->macrocycle->user->actualTrainer();

So what I end up doing is basically traversing the relationships step by step, but encapsulated inside these helpers to avoid repeating long chains everywhere.

Because of that, I was wondering if a package like has-many-deep would actually change the underlying behavior, or if it would just be a different way of expressing the same traversal.

My understanding is that even with a deep relationship, Laravel would still need to resolve the same underlying relations, unless everything is eager loaded or translated into a single SQL query with joins.

Am I understanding this correctly, or is there a more fundamental difference I’m missing in terms of how the data is actually retrieved or optimized?

I'm really confused :(

martinbean's avatar

@mikelmedina No. You shouldn’t be using helpers to “fix” bad code. You should just be eager-loading the relationships you actually need for a request.

izdrail's avatar

My custom ai trained on laravel documentations says the following:

When working with nested relationships in Laravel, defining helper methods on models can streamline the process of accessing related data. However, it's crucial to consider whether the helper methods will still function correctly if the relationships are already loaded from memory.

Introduction Imagine you have a nested relationship chain in your application, like the one shown in the diagram above. You define a helper method on a model that traverses this chain, such as the Microcycle model. The helper method is intended to simplify access to the related data, but in this case, the relationships are already loaded when the application is instantiated.

Step-by-Step Explanation Step 1: Define the Helper Method Let's define a helper method actualTrainer() on the Microcycle model. This method will traverse the nested relationship chain:

Please or to participate in this conversation.