Be part of JetBrains PHPverse 2026 on June 9 – a free online event bringing PHP devs worldwide together.

masum_molla's avatar

When and why do we use Laravel Inertiajs Vue3?

For production-level applications -> Do we need to use a separate frontend ( Vue3 ) and Backend ( Laravel ) from the beginning?

or will Laravel InertiaJS ( Vue3 ) be best for good applications from the beginning?

Thank You

0 likes
6 replies
LaryAI's avatar
Level 58

When deciding whether to use Laravel with Inertia.js and Vue 3 for a production-level application, it's important to consider the specific needs of your project and the benefits that this stack can provide.

Inertia.js is a library that allows you to create a single-page application (SPA) without much of the complexity that comes with a full Vue.js frontend and a separate backend API. It allows you to write your Vue components and manage your frontend just like a typical Vue SPA, but your page visits are powered by server-side routing and controllers, thanks to Laravel.

Here are some reasons why you might choose Laravel with Inertia.js and Vue 3 for your project:

  1. Tighter Integration: Since Inertia.js allows you to use server-side routes and controllers to manage page visits, you can leverage the full power of Laravel's features directly within your Vue components. This can lead to a more integrated development experience.

  2. Simplified Stack: By using Inertia.js, you avoid the complexity of managing API endpoints for a separate frontend application. This can simplify development and reduce the amount of code you need to maintain.

  3. Faster Prototyping: If you need to move quickly from idea to prototype, Laravel with Inertia.js and Vue 3 can be a great choice. You can iterate rapidly without having to set up and manage a separate API.

  4. Reduced Complexity for SEO: Since Inertia.js serves pages via server-side controllers, it can be easier to manage SEO compared to a fully client-side SPA, which often requires additional tools like server-side rendering or pre-rendering.

  5. Shared Authentication: You can use Laravel's built-in authentication for your Vue components without the need for separate tokens or API authentication mechanisms.

However, there are also scenarios where you might prefer a separate frontend and backend:

  1. Large Scale Applications: For very large applications with complex frontend requirements, a separate frontend might be beneficial. This allows for more focused scaling and optimization of the frontend and backend independently.

  2. Microservices Architecture: If you're planning to build a microservices architecture, having a separate frontend application that communicates with various backend services via APIs might be more appropriate.

  3. Diverse Frontend Needs: If your application will have multiple frontends (web, mobile, desktop), a separate API backend can serve all these clients without duplication of logic.

In conclusion, whether you should use Laravel with Inertia.js and Vue 3 from the beginning depends on your project requirements. If you value a simplified stack with tight integration between the frontend and backend and you're not building a highly complex application, Laravel with Inertia.js and Vue 3 can be an excellent choice. If you anticipate needing a more decoupled architecture, starting with a separate frontend and backend might be the better path.

Here's a basic example of how you might set up a Laravel route using Inertia.js and Vue 3:

// In a Laravel routes file
Route::get('/dashboard', function () {
    return Inertia::render('Dashboard', [
        'props' => 'value'
    ]);
});

And the corresponding Vue 3 component:

<template>
  <div>
    <h1>Dashboard</h1>
    <!-- Your dashboard content here -->
  </div>
</template>

<script>
export default {
  props: {
    // Define the props your component will receive from Laravel
  },
  // Component logic here
}
</script>

Remember to install and set up Inertia.js according to the official documentation to ensure everything works smoothly.

jaseofspades88's avatar

There's barely any difference between your two use cases. Inertia is more than production ready.

gych's avatar

It depends on your preference and which application you're going to make but both have their benefits.

This is my opinion:

Laravel with inertia is faster, easier to work with and easier to debug than a separated SPA.

If you use Laravel as API you have the advantage that it can serve multiple front end applications. With inertia this is also possible but you'll have to handle api routes together with web routes. Your back end and front end are also separated which makes it easier for front end devs to work on the SPA and they don't need to know anything about how Laravel works.

Personally I am a big fan of Inertia but I know that in some cases Laravel as API with separated SPA can be better.

For production both will work well, some find deploying Laravel with Inertia less complex since its one application.

Please or to participate in this conversation.