Be part of JetBrains PHPverse 2026 on June 9 – a free online event bringing PHP devs worldwide together.

Caio-Tera's avatar

Unexpected Index Omission with constrained() and Composite unique()

Hello everyone,

I'm trying to get a definitive clarification on the index creation behavior of ->constrained() when used in a table that also has a composite unique index. I've encountered a scenario where an expected index is not being created, and I'd like to understand if this is intended behavior.

Context:

  • Laravel Version: 12.x
  • PostgreSQL Version: 17.x

The Scenario

Let's say I have three migrations to create authors, categories, and a books table.

1. authors table:

Schema::create('authors', function (Blueprint $table) {
    $table->id();
    $table->string('name');
    $table->timestamps();
});

2. categories table:

Schema::create('categories', function (Blueprint $table) {
    $table->id();
    $table->string('name')->unique();
    $table->timestamps();
});

3. books table: This is where the unexpected behavior occurs. The table has two foreign keys and a composite unique index.

Schema::create('books', function (Blueprint $table) {
    $table->id();
    $table->foreignId('author_id')->constrained();
    $table->foreignId('category_id')->constrained();
    $table->string('title');
    $table->timestamps();

    // A book title must be unique for a given author.
    $table->unique(['author_id', 'title']);
});

The Expectation

Based on Laravel's conventions, I expected the books table to have three performance indexes:

  1. A primary key index on id.
  2. A unique composite index on (author_id, title).
  3. A simple B-Tree index on category_id (created by the ->constrained() method).

The simple index on author_id would be correctly omitted as redundant because author_id is the leading column in the composite unique index.

The Actual Result

However, after running the migration and inspecting the database directly with the following query:

SELECT indexname, indexdef
FROM pg_indexes
WHERE tablename = 'books';

The result only shows two indexes:

indexname indexdef
books_pkey CREATE UNIQUE INDEX books_pkey ON public.books USING btree (id)
books_author_id_title_unique CREATE UNIQUE INDEX books_author_id_title_unique ON public.books USING btree (author_id, title)

The expected index on category_id is missing.

The Question

Is this omission of the category_id index the intended behavior of Laravel's schema builder?

It seems that the presence of the unique(['author_id', 'title']) composite index is preventing the creation of other expected indexes from ->constrained(). This could lead to silent performance issues on queries filtering by category_id.

Any clarification on whether this is a bug or an undocumented optimization feature would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks!

0 likes
4 replies
newbie360's avatar

That is not Laravel problem, if PostgreSQL is same as MySQL read this carefully

https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.4/en/multiple-column-indexes.html

If the table has a multiple-column index, any leftmost prefix of the index can be used by the optimizer to look up rows. For example, if you have a three-column index on (col1, col2, col3), you have indexed search capabilities on (col1), (col1, col2), and (col1, col2, col3)

Caio-Tera's avatar

Hi @newbie360,

Thanks for the quick reply, bro.

You are absolutely right about how multi-column indexes work. That perfectly explains why a separate index on author_id is not needed, since it's the leading column in the unique(['author_id', 'title']) index. I'm 100% on board with that.

However, the core of my question, which I might not have made clear enough, is about the second foreign key, category_id.

The category_id column isn't part of any composite index, yet the expected index from its ->constrained() method is also being omitted. This seems to happen only when the other composite index exists.

This suggests the schema builder's optimization logic is being too aggressive and is incorrectly dropping an index that is not redundant.

Do you have any thoughts on why the index for category_id would also be missing?

newbie360's avatar

@Caio-Tera Oops, i misread your open post, is title not category_id

$table->unique(['author_id', 'title']);

yes that's something wrong, and i saw someone want to fix this issue in laravel/framework, may be just wait O.o

Please or to participate in this conversation.