Asking for a GIT workflow recommendation
Hi everyone, I have a project that I'm doing for a friend, but later I asked him if I can use the project for reselling it and making it open source with the intention to have two projects that will be evolving differently, primarily the front-end- and logos.
However the private project still have small issues here and there, so I want to make bugfixes in any project and share it when it doesn't change the purpose of each project.
I was thinking in having two different directories in my computer and both of them having two remotes so I can make pull requests to the not origin remote and the origin one. I tried that, but after some features I found it a little bit messy. I will be the only developer for a while so there is no need of making the workflow the simpler but I think I'm over-engineering the workflow so I wanna know if anyone has worked with a similar approach or if you recommend just having two branches for now. Or any other suggestion.
Thanks
@punksolid Sounds like you would have a “base” repository, and a fork of that repository.
Maybe the open source one is the base repository, and the “private” repository is the fork. You make your bug fixes and features in the base repository, and then pull them into the fork.
Please or to participate in this conversation.