While this is a nice workflow, isn't the Ralph Wiggum loop when you iterate on the same task over and over to get the most polished result? I thought the concept was you're approaching the same problem over and over again with clean context to catch anything it may have missed from the initial prompt. This helps to get a better result than if you just did the task once.

Don't get me wrong -- This is a totally useful workflow, but I thought Ralph Wiggum was something else.