Snapey

does your route accept an id?

does the form send the id?

I always use .env

I always make sure that only the public folder can be accessed from the outside.

then you need to pass in the ID of the record to be updated or use route model binding and have Laravel get the right record for you.

This is basics.... perhaps 0 lessons completed is a clue

open tinker, type

>>> config('filesystems')

and then paste the result

@wakanda

this won't work, each time you call uniqid it will return a different value

 while (Storage::disk('report_upload')->exists($name . '.xlsx')) {
            $name .= $counter;
            $counter++;

        $newdir = 'Reportes-' . uniqid();

            Storage::disk('report_upload')->makeDirectory($newdir);
        }

        Excel::store(new SurveyReport($items), $name . '.xlsx',  'report_upload/'. $newdir);

What's your question?

You seriously need to watch some videos or read some articles. There are loads of free lessons here and on Youtube. I see you have done just one.

Use a timestamp

you are using $request->request_time but this includes characters that are not valid for use in a folder name.

I had assumed that a function called from a job would inherit the jobs timeout but maybe not?

It does

function store(Request $request)
    {
        $this->validate($request, [
            'name'=>'required',
            'description'=>'required'
        ]);


        $post = Post::query()->create(
            'name ' => $request->name,
            'description' => $request->description,
        );

        foreach($request->stores as $store) {

            $post->stores()->create([
                'store_name' => $store['store_name'],
                'store_link' => $store['store_link'],
             ]);

        }
        return redirect()->route('posts.index');
    }

and you have to make sure that all mentioned fields are in the $fillable array on the models

It's name function in model Post.

public function getNameStoreForPost()
{
    return $this->hasMany(Store::class);
}

Then it ought to be called stores and then it would be obvious what the code was trying to do

your function needs to accept the same name as the resource

Your resource route is allartworks so the parameter passed to the show method should be allartwork

Confirm this by looking at php artisan route:list

you will see the resource name.

So. probably something like;

public function show(Artwork $allartwork)
{
    return $allartwork;
}

validate all the data, write it to the models

there's not really much more to it than that.

Just passing $request->all() tells me you have not really thought about it

Also, if you want to add more rows with the same name then your form fields naming needs to include array syntax

   <div>
        <label>Links</label>
            <input type="text" name="stores[]store_name">
            <input type="text" name="stores[]store_link">
    </div>

and then the same in your javascript

are you calling some third party api?

you could add a try-catch block around the code in your job and then you will get control of there is an error and can then dump relevant logging

you could temporarily add more logging to the job and then check in the laravel logfile later?

but, why do you have both

Route::resource('artworks', 'ArtworkController');
Route::resource('allartworks', 'AllArtworkController');

your function needs to accept the same name as the resource

Your resource route is allartworks so the parameter passed to the show method should be allartwork

Confirm this by looking at php artisan route:list

you will see the resource name.

So. probably something like;

public function show(Artwork $allartwork)
{
    return $allartwork;
}

what does the route look like?

Media Library and Media Library Pro are different things.

Whats a spy?

messing with casts is not going to make any difference if the column is not in a datetime format

or use the optional helper, or a default model

https://laravel.com/docs/8.x/helpers#method-optional

https://laravel.com/docs/8.x/eloquent-relationships#default-models

personally I use null coalesce whenever I have two arrows in a view

but you are clueless why?

check what the original email contains. Google can't just invent a subdomain

in your job constructor you have said it's only acceptable to pass a Pros model

public function __construct(Pros $pros)

you n have a look around my project here which is public

https://github.com/snapey/r4fb

In this the permissions are hard coded because they need to be used within the various controllers and views. Having a way to create permissions through the UI would be pointless because none of the functions are checking for that new permission

But the admin can create new roles and say what permissions are allowed within that new role. Since access control is only done through permissions the name of the role can be anything the admin likes it is only used to confer a set of permissions

usually a permissions issue

outlook and google obfuscate links in urls to stop you being able to click them directly. This is so that they can block the link if they need to because it turns out dangerous

https://support.google.com/mail/answer/10173182?hl=en-GB&ref_topic=3394657

so the last line of your code in the stack trace is SubscriptionController.php at line 60

what code is that?

Have you done anything with language translation files?

stacktrace?

Rest assured there is no such setting.

What is in the view file ?

What editor have you used on the code?

I don't know if you understood my question

Clearly you have a recursive loop which is usually caused by two models both automatically eager loading the other by use of $with statements in each model

the first method fills the model with an array and therefore counts as mass assignment so all of the fields mentioned must be fillable or the model unguarded

The second method assigns the values individually so does not care about mass assignment

Also, in the first method you assign to a property called $id but in the second you do not

You also show two different methods of accessing the request variables. both are valid, and as shown, they work the same

Your model is called Products. You will get along with other developers better if you stick to singular names for models

Your primary key appears to be called prod_id which is also a break from conventions and will mean extra work when defining relations

I would say both methods are ok for your first month in coding

A more professional developer would probably pass only validated data into the model

... and why are you returning a view from a repository?

why not show the actual error including the line of code?

But Laravel generates also closing tag:

it won't be creating the closing tag, but your browser will show it where it is assuming it is closed when you view in the developer tools. If you view the actual source your html would be invalid because the tag is not closed.

There is no problem developing in a windows environment but really you should deploy to a unix server for production.

do you have $with in your models?

what does the data look like in the database? Your question does not make any sense at the moment.

@yadav2brand post your own question with your own scenario

WHAT error?

"same error" is absolutely no use for diagnosing the problem

You just need to learn how to deploy on a web server like apache or nginx. I could not tell what OS your IONOS server uses, but really you should be using Linux.

why not? Its their business to track your every move.

I have never built an application that needs 16 seconds to draw the view. Thats ridiculous

This line

$file->move("uploads/" .,$name_gen);  

and this line

->move(uploads/" . $name_gen);

are both invalid php syntax

LOOK in the logfile

@laithalenooz use get() instead of all() when eager loading

do you have millions of students? A database query should not take that long, but you hint at filtering and reorganising the data in php?

seems to me like it's more likely that product belongs to sector?

Anyway to get it working

-rename the column to product_id and add an id column to the sectors table. remove the primary key statement in the model

eager load sector

public function index()
    {
       $products = Product::with('sector')->get();
       return view('worker.index', compact('products'));
    }

in the view use $product->sector->field ?? 'no sector'

your relation is called sector not sectors

the null coalesce operator ?? handles the case where a product is missing its sector