bestmomo

Also look at the documentation, it's well done.

Your storage is not always placed locally but for example on S3. In this case you need a symbolic link.

It's really a matter of personal taste. I sometimes use Bootstrap and sometimes Materialize according to my mood. In any case, you still have to adapt the framework according to the desired visual effect. Depending on the type of project it will guide the choice.

There are good comparatives on the subject like this one.

@towhid For example I have this view for a form :

@extends('layouts.form')

@section('card')

    @component('components.card')

        @slot('title')
            @lang('Ajouter un album')
        @endslot

        <form method="POST" action="{{ route('album.store') }}">
            @csrf

            @include('partials.form-group', [
                'title' => __('Nom'),
                'type' => 'text',
                'name' => 'name',
                'required' => true,
                ])

            @component('components.button')
                @lang('Envoyer')
            @endcomponent

        </form>

    @endcomponent

@endsection

The syntax is clean.

I have a component card, another for the button and a partial pour the input. Here is the partial :

<div class="form-group">
    <label for="{{ $name }}">{{ $title }}</label>
    <input id="{{ $name }}" type="{{ $type }}" class="form-control{{ $errors->has($name) ? ' is-invalid' : '' }}"
           name="{{ $name }}" value="{{ old($name, isset($value) ? $value : '') }}" {{ $required ? 'required' : ''}}>

    @if ($errors->has($name))
        <div class="invalid-feedback">
            {{ $errors->first($name) }}
        </div>
    @endif
</div>

And for eaxample the card component :

<div class="card text-white bg-dark mb-3">
    <h4 class="card-header">
        {{ $title }}
    </h4>
    <div class="card-body">
        {{ $slot }}
    </div>
</div>

You must call your class :

class DatabaseSeeder extends Seeder

...


public function run()
{
        $this->call(ProductSeeder::class);
}

public_html is your server directory, helper will work if your domain points well on this folder.

So it's the issue, inverse it.

Yes it's much cleaner with @if and @else.

Which code did you put in DatabaseSeeder.php ?

Not sure it's the problem but using clone() has the side-effect of producing elements with duplicate id attributes.

Is your Javascript code included before jQuery loading ?

I think $faker->words generate an array.

Have a look at all helpers ;)

It's much better to create custom Blender components.

What do you mean with card ?

In your place I will use version 5.8 without hesitation

For upgrade the best way is to use a fresh new install and copy files. It may seem longer but finally we save time.

For information I added Controllers command with V0.3

With a good hoster you can set the public directory for any sub-domain.

Just checked new version 5.8, migrations work nice for me...

For information I added List command with V0.2

hi,

I see in config file that you can choose your generator :

/*
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Captcha generator.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Must implement GeneratorInterface.
|
*/
'generator' => \Igoshev\Captcha\Captcha\Generator\GeneratorWaves::class,

So you can create your own generator et change config to select it.

If you get Trying to get property 'blogpost' of non-object means that you dont get the user, so route binding is not working. How is your route ?

Are you sure the data is passed by parent composant when the child is mounted ?

You should get all values with your syntax...

To select a pair key/value you only need an index and use Object.entries to get the element.

It might also be interesting to do route model binding to avoid :

$instructor = \App\Instructor::find($id);

Thanks both for answers.

@bobbybouwmann

I am not very good with UX ;)

• I planned to develop the tool with the generation of declared controllers.
• For route:list as I use Javascript to generate I can't get the PHP intendance, I'll see that...
• Extra templates would be nice ;)

Or simply :

public function imageUrl($region, $bucket, $directory, $file)
{
    return "http://s3.$region.amazonaws.com/$bucket/$directory/$file";
}

Hello the forum !

I made a little tool to facilitate the writing of the route file for Laravel. It's still in alpha version.

Hope it'll help...

Thank you fort interesting answers but my initial question is on code organisation :)

I made something with Laravel 5.2 to use it with code PHP :

require getcwd() . '/../../../../bootstrap/autoload.php'; // Adapt to your path
$app = require_once getcwd() . '/../../../../bootstrap/app.php';
$kernel = $app->make('Illuminate\Contracts\Http\Kernel');
$response = $kernel->handle(
  $request = Illuminate\Http\Request::capture()
);
$id = $app['encrypter']->decrypt($_COOKIE[$app['config']['session.cookie']]);
$app['session']->driver()->setId($id);
$app['session']->driver()->start();

Then you have Laravel in $app and use $app['auth'] I dont know if it still works with 5.7 version.

Look at documentation.

For a clean upgrade install Laravel 5.7 and copy all files. Seems longer but you'll spend less time with bugs tracking ;)

With an empty string ?

I made something with Laravel 5.2 to get Laravel app from core PHP :

require getcwd() . '/../../../../bootstrap/autoload.php';
$app = require_once getcwd() . '/../../../../bootstrap/app.php';
$kernel = $app->make('Illuminate\Contracts\Http\Kernel');
$response = $kernel->handle(
  $request = Illuminate\Http\Request::capture()
);
$id = $app['encrypter']->decrypt($_COOKIE[$app['config']['session.cookie']]);
$app['session']->driver()->setId($id);
$app['session']->driver()->start();

Dont know if it works with recent Laravel version but it's a way. You can use $app['auth'] for example.

There is no rule, make as you feel. Code organisation is a story of personal covenant unless the development is done by several people, so they have to agree...

I have explored the available packages to facilitate the construction of an administration: Voyager, LaraAdmin, Backpack, Boilerplate (not Nova which is a paid solution and I code only for fun) and others ... But I can not satisfy myself and I ended almost systematically to create something in my own way ...

But whether it is a package or the personal code we end up with a transplant not necessarily well digested. I like the isolation of treatments because it makes things clearer. At the code level it's easy but when we reason more globally it becomes problematic.

So I thought after all why not completely distinguish frontend and backend with two separate installations of Laravel (or other)? The advantage of the package-specific separation is preserved without the inconvenience of code complexity and mandatory entanglements. It is also easy to reuse the code by enriching it with each project by providing optional features for example.

I think that I will adopt this approach for my next project but I would like to have your opinion on the subject ...

Not sure to understand your question but array_merge is always working.

@alihoushyaripour

I made a test, you can add an attribute to your model and after send it to your resource. It works.

I made a simple UserResource and :

$user = User::find(1);
$user->test = 'ok';
$resource = new UserResource($user);
dd($resource);

I get that for the resource :

#attributes: array:12 [▼
      "id" => 1
      "name" => "Adam"

      ...

      "test" => "ok"
    ]

Maybe you can use this PR to make it work with Bootstrap 4.

Could you show dd($data['Documents']) ?

1. I would create a One To One relation between Image and Product (Image has one Product with foreign key on Product).

2. I dont really understand, you load relation only if you use productImages().

Usually setLocale is set in a middleware.

Why not just add this to gift ?

$gift->from = 'PlaceController';

Just send 2 parameters and update your middleware code. Look at documentation.

Something like that :

'middleware'=>['auth', 'Role:1,2']]

...

public function handle($request, Closure $next, $role1, $role2)
{
    if (!Auth::check()) {
        return redirect('/login');
    }

    if ($request->user()->role != $role1 && $request->user()->role != $role2) {
        return abort(404);
    }

    return $next($request);
}

@lostdreamer_nl

I think now it's perfect ;)

My first line was to get a simpler collection, not sure it's a good idea...

Hello,

With your solution you send 3 queries to database, not really optimized. Maybe this kind of code is better :

$all = collect(User::all()->toArray());

$users = $all->where('competition1', 'yes')->map(function($item, $key) {
    $item['location'] = 'foo';
    return $item;
})->concat($all->where('competition2', 'yes')->map(function($item, $key) {
    $item['location'] = 'bar';
    return $item;
})->concat($all->where('competition3', 'yes')->map(function($item, $key) {
    $item['location'] = 'some';
    return $item;
})));

dd($users);

Maybe this one.

If you use Eloquent just do that :

$regios = App\Regio::withCount('inscricoes')->get();

From manual :

$a !== $b Not identical TRUE if $a is not equal to $b, or they are not of the same type.